National Research Council, Division on Engineering and's 2003 Assessment of the Office of Naval Research's Marine PDF

By National Research Council, Division on Engineering and Physical Sciences, Naval Studies Board, Committee for the Review of ONR's Marine Corps Science and Technology Program

The workplace of Naval learn (ONR) money study throughout a large diversity of medical and engineering disciplines in help of the military and Marine Corps. to make sure that its investments are serving these ends and are of top quality, ONR calls for every one of its departments to suffer annual overview. due to the fact 1999, the Naval Expeditionary war division of ONR has asked that the NRC behavior those experiences. This file offers the result of the second one assessment of the Marine Corps technology and know-how software. the 1st overview was once carried out in 2000. The 2003 evaluate examines the general Marine Corps S&T software, the littoral wrestle destiny naval potential, the center thrusts of this system, and uncomplicated learn actions.

Show description

Read Online or Download 2003 Assessment of the Office of Naval Research's Marine Corps Science and Technology Program (Onr Assessment) PDF

Best software: office software books

Read e-book online 2.2 - Die Office-Alternative(de)(ISBN PDF

Wenn sich jemand mit der Entwicklung einer neuen Burosoftware beschaftigt, sollte er sich zunachst einmal anschauen, was once die einschlagige Konkurrenz zu diesem Thema auf den Markt gebracht hat. Dann sollte er die guten Losungsansatze der Konkurrenz ubernehmen - vielleicht sogar nachahmen - und fiir die nicht so guten Losungen neue Ideen entwickeln.

Read e-book online Charts and Graphs for Microsoft(R) Office Excel 2007 PDF

One can create a foul taking a look chart in Excel. This booklet teaches you how to unencumber the gorgeous formatting innovations to be had to make tremendous having a look charts. the 1st part will speak about find out how to come to a decision which chart kind to take advantage of. next chapters will stroll via every one chart variety, how you can create them, the way to make the most of them, and distinct strategies on hand for every chart.

Additional info for 2003 Assessment of the Office of Naval Research's Marine Corps Science and Technology Program (Onr Assessment)

Sample text

September. 8Department of the Navy. 1994. “Forward . . S. , September 19. 9LtGen Paul K. ). 1997. , November. MARINE CORPS S&T PROGRAM AS A WHOLE Expeditionary Maneuver Warfare Toward the end of the 1990s, the emergence of the Navy’s Sea Power 21 concept of operations along with the growing realization that OMFTS did not sufficiently capture other critical operations native to the Marine Corps—such as sustained operations ashore and military operations other than war—gave rise to the need for a broader concept.

In addition, the LC-FNC investment strategy formulation process has resulted in a useful means for connecting Code 353 with the Marine Corps user community. To identify and prioritize current STOM capability shortfalls, Code 353 included a combination of expert panels (users, technologists, and so on) engaged in war gaming and other similar concept generation exercises. These exercises resulted in a series of Broad Agency Announcement (BAA) solicitations seeking innovative improvements that address critical shortfall technologies.

As described in Chapter 1, a formal process put in place by Code 353 to convert LC-FNC goals into an S&T investment strategy uses war games and other similar concept-generating exercises to identify and prioritize current Ship-to-Objective Maneuver (STOM) capability shortfalls as input for a longterm, concrete plan of action for the LC-FNC program. 1. Near-term efforts (to be completed in as little as 18 months) are intended to provide rapid results and a funding wedge for the LC-FNC, so that slowly ramped up funding can be allocated without limiting its future use for developing the long-term efforts identified in the planning process.

Download PDF sample

Rated 4.79 of 5 – based on 41 votes